<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evaluation on Prerit Ahuja</title><link>https://preritahuja.com/tags/evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Evaluation on Prerit Ahuja</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://preritahuja.com/tags/evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Capital Markets LLM Reliability Score (CM-LRS): From Plausible to Bankable</title><link>https://preritahuja.com/insights/cm-lrs-from-plausible-to-bankable/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://preritahuja.com/insights/cm-lrs-from-plausible-to-bankable/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;A new evaluation framework for LLM outputs in regulated capital-markets workflows, with empirical results across four independent judges and five workflows.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The question is rarely whether a frontier LLM can draft a debt-terms table, a comparable-transactions write-up, or an issuer profile that reads smoothly on first pass. They all can. The harder question is whether the draft is &lt;em&gt;bankable&lt;/em&gt;: whether a banker, analyst, or compliance reviewer can defend it in front of a counter-party or a regulator with the underlying documents in hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>